Civil Jurisdiction And Jury Court: Proposals For Improvement In Spain From Comparative Law


  • Alfonso Ortega Giménez Universidad Miguel Hernández


Court, Jury, Reform, Continental, Anglo-Saxon


The Jury court is a fairly common institution in any of the existing legal systems in the world. There is an important difference between the continental and Anglo-Saxon models, highlighting the main difference the existence of the Jury court in civil litigation, unusual situation in the continental system with exceptions, and in particular in Spain. We will also analyze a hypothetical reform of the Jury in Spain by doing a legal analysis with other States.


Download data is not yet available.


1. BENNETT M., “Unraveling the Gordian Knot of Implicit Biasin Jury Selection: The Problems of Judge-Dominated Voir Dire, the Failed Promise of Batson, and Proposed Solutions”, HARV. L. & POL’Y REV, nº 149, 2010.
2. BERMÚDEZ REQUENA, Juan Manuel, “Tribunal del Jurado Modelo y Proceso”, Ed. Tirant lo Blanch, 2016.
3. CALPARSORO, J. Fiscal Superior del País Vasco: “XX años del Tribunal del Jurado”, Conferencia en la Academia Vasca del Derecho, 26 de marzo del 2015.
4. CARBONEL MATEU, J.C.: “El Jurado y la Constitución de 1978”; Jornadas sobre el Jurado, Universidad de Extremadura, Cáceres, 1989.
5. CORRICK, K. y ROSENBERG, M., “Trial by Jury: The Canadian experience”, in Sistemas Judiciales, nº 17, 2013.
6. DAVIDSON, Kathy, The Right to Trial by Jury in Complex Litigation, 20 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 329, Washington, 1978, pp. 335-337.
7. DENNING, L., The Discipline of Law, Butterworths. Londres 1979, p. 197.
8. GABRIELI LLOBREGAT, J. y GIMENO SENDRA, V., Ley Orgánica del Tribunal del Jurado comentada, Colex, Madrid, 1996
9. HACKNEY BLACKWELL, Amy, “The essential law dictionary. USA”, Ed. Shinx, 2008.
10. HOUSING., “¬The Seventh Amendment– A Return to Fundamentals”, 10 Urb. L. Ann. 313, 1975.
11. HUTTNER C., “Unfit for Jury Determination: Complex Civil Litigation and the Seventh Amendment Right of Trial by Jury”, 20 B.C.L. Rev. 511, Boston, 1979, pp. 522-524.
12. LORCA NAVARRETE, A, Mª. “El Jurado Español: La Nueva Ley del Jurado”, Ed: Dykinson, 1996.
13. MAITLAND, F. W., The Constitutional History of England, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1908, pp. 221–226
14. PÉREZ CEBADA, Mª Ángeles, “Las instrucciones al jurado”, Ed., Tirant lo Blanch, 2017.
15. PÉREZ MARÍN, Mª Ángeles, “Procedimiento ante el jurado. Teoría y práctica”, Ed., Jurua, 2016.
16. RUVA, Christine L., How Pretrial Publicity Affects Juror Decision Making and Memory. EE.UU., University of South Florida, 2010.
17. SEASE, E., “Markman Misses The Mark, Miserably”, Journal Of Law, Technology & Policy, Vol. 2004, nº 1, 2004, pp. 100-104; y HIGBEE JR, P., “The Jury's Role in Patent Cases: Markman v. Westview Instruments, Inc”, 3 J. Intell. Prop. L. 407, 1996.
18. SKOLNIL, Terry, “The Jury System in Canada”, Sistemas Judiciales, nº 17, 2013.
19. TEDFORD, Thomas L., “Freedom of speech in the United State”. USA: Strata
20. Publishing
21. THOMAS, S., “The Seventh Amendment, Modern Procedure, and the English Common Law”, 82 Wash. U. L. Q. 687, Washington D.C, 2004.
22. THOMPSON, R., “Determining Foreign Law Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 44.1”, Hawkins Parnell Thackston & Young LLP, 2011.
23. YÁÑEZ VELASCO, Ricardo, “La institución del jurado: introducción a su estudio psicosocial”, Ed., Reus, S.A., 2014.
24. YORIO, E. y THEL, S., Contract Enforcement. Specific Performance and Injuctions (2ª edición., Wolters Kluwer, Nueva York, 2017.
25. VALERO ROMERO, Mª Amparo, “La Argumentación Lingüística en los Juicios con Jurado”, Ed., Tirant lo Blanch, 2018.



How to Cite

Ortega Giménez, A. (2019). Civil Jurisdiction And Jury Court: Proposals For Improvement In Spain From Comparative Law. SOCIALSCI JOURNAL, 3, 31-51. Retrieved from



Research Articles