A Proposed Style to Rationalize Decision-Making in Public Policy Making in Gulf Cooperation Countries
The approach of this paper is both normative and analytical. The normative aspect intends to present one possible rational approach, i.e., Multigoal Analysis, to address the challenges posed by some types of public policy problems in the Gulf Cooperation Countries and to help provide manageable information on public policy problems to address uncertainty surrounding them. Many important public policy issue areas present considerable challenges to policymakers in the Gulf Cooperation Countries. The traditional economic tools such as cost-benefit analysis (CBO) and cost-effectiveness (CE), emphasize the criteria of efficiency and admit only quantitatively monetized criteria. Therefore they are not suitable for some ill-structured types of public problems encountered by the Gulf Cooperation Countries policymakers because they involve many criteria. Unlike the economic tools, the Multigoal approach integrates economic, social, political, administrative as well as other types of criteria that are important to policymakers in the Gulf Cooperation Countries. Unfortunately, at present policy advisors in the GCC in different areas of ill-structured problems are drawn from economists and business administration specialists who, by their very training, do not consider any criteria beyond efficiency and effectiveness. The analytical side of the paper seeks to review critically in public policy analysis the literature and to analyze the particular political context in the Gulf Cooperation Countries and the types of public problems it produces.
2. Balaam, David N., and Veseth, Michael, 2005. Introduction to International Political Economy. Upper Saddle, New Jersey: Pearson Hall.
3. Beckman, N. 1977. “Policy Analysis in Government: Alternatives to Muddling Through.” Public Administration Review 37(2). pp. 221-227.
4. Bickers, Kenneth and Williams, John, T. .2001. Public Policy Analysis: A Political Economy Approach. Boston and New York, Houghton Mifflin Company.
5. Bingham, Richard, D., and Ethridge, Marcus, E. 1982. Reaching Decision in Public Policy and Administration: Methods and Applications. New York and London: Longman
6. Bohrs, Ton, and Bartlett, Robert V., 1993. Environmental Policy in New Zealand. The Politics of Clean and Green. Oxford University Press.
7. Birkland, T. 2016, An Introduction to the Policy Process: Theories, Concepts, and Models of Public Policy, Abingdon, Oxon: Taylor and Francis
8. Caramani, Daniele, 2008 Comparative Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9. Cullis, John and Jones, Philip. 1998. Public Finance and Public Choice. Oxford: Oxford University Press
10. deleon, P., 2008. “The Historical Roots of the Field,” in Morgan, M., Rein, M. & Goodwin R., (2008), Oxford: The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy, Oxford University Press
11. deleon, P. and Vogenbeck, M. 2007. “The Policy Sciences at the Crossroads.” Fischer, F., Grand J. Miller and Mara S. Sidney (eds.). Handbook of Policy Analysis: Theories, Politics, and Methods. Boca Raton, London, New York: CRC Press.
12. Downs, Anthony, 1985. An Economic Theory of Democracy. Boston: Addison Wesley.
13. Dunn, William, N., 2018. Public Policy Analysis: An Introduction. New York: Routledge
14. Dye, Thomas R. (2013). Understanding Public Policy. Boston: Pearson
15. Elhussein, Ahmed M. 1989. “Policy Analysis and Public Administration: A Theoretical Perspective,” The Indian Journal of Public Administration, 35 (2)
16. Elhussein, Ahmed M. 2002. Introduction to Policy Analysis (In Arabic). The Academic Centre for Political Studies.
17. Fischer, F. 2007. “Deliberative Policy Analysis As Practical Reason: Integrating Empirical And Normative Arguments.” in Fischer, F., Miller, G. & Sidney M. (2007). Handbook of Public Policy Analysis: Theories, Politics, and Methods, London: CRC Press, Taylor, and Francis Group
18. Friedman, L. S. 2002. The Microeconomics of Public Policy Analysis, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
19. Gruber, Jonathan. 2011. Public Finance and Public Policy. New York: Worth Publisher
20. Gupta, Dipak, K. 2001. Analyzing Public Policy: Concepts, Tools, and Techniques. Washington D. C.: CQPress
21. Hamad Bin Khalifa University (2017). Retrieved from http://www.hbku.edu.qa/en/admissions#tab257,
22. Hausman, Daniel, McPherson, Satz, Debra, 2017. Economic Analysis, Moral Philosophy, and Public Policy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
23. Heady, Ferrel 2001. Public Administration: A Comprehensive Perspective (6th ed.). New York and Basel: Marcel Dekker, INC.
24. Heinemann, Robert, A., Bluhm, William, T. Peterson, Steven, A., and Kearny, Edward. N. 2002. The World of the Policy Analyst: Rationality, Values, and Politic. New York and London: Chatham House Publishers
25. Hogwood, Brian W., and Gunn, Lewis, A. 1990. Policy Analysis for the Real World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26. Huey-Tsyh Chen and Peter H. Rossi, 1980. “The Multigoal Analysis, Theory-Driven Approach to Evaluation: A Model Linking Basic and Applied Social Science.” Social ForcesVol. 59, No. 1 (Sep. 1980), pp. 106-122
27. Ilchman and Uphoff, 1971. The Political Economy of Change. Berkeley and Los Angeles: The University of California Press.
28. Khodr, Hiba, 2014. “A Preliminary Comparative Study of Policy-making in Two GCC Countries—Qatar and Kuwait: Processes, Politics, and Participants.” Politics and Policy, 42 (2), 271-310.
29. Kraft, Michael and Furlong, Scott R. 2018. Public Policy: Politics, Analysis, and Alternatives. Los Angeles: CQ Press, Sage
30. Lasswell, H., 2011. Politics: Who Gets What, When, How? Literary Licensing, LLC
31. Lerner, D, Lasswell, H., Lerner, Harold D. (1951) The Policy Sciences: Recent Developments in Scope and Method, Stanford University Press
32. Levy, J.M. 1995. Essential Microeconomics for Public Policy Analysis. London: Praeger.
33. Linz, J., 1975. “Totalitarian and Authoritarian Regimes,” in. Greenstein, F.and Polsby, N. (eds.), Handbook of Political Science iii: Macropolitical Theory. Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley.
34. Mansour, Ahmed M.E, 2008. The Impact of Privatization on the United Arab Emirates (UAE) Federal Public Sector, International Public Management Review (IPMR) 9 (2)
35. Mansour, Ahmed M. E., 2016. “Population Imbalance as a Public Policy Problem in the United Arab Emirates,” “in Douglas J. Besharov and Mark Lopez (eds.) Adjusting to a World in Motion: Trends in Global Migration and Migration Policy, Oxford University Press
36. Mansour, Ahmed M. E. 2010. “The Style of Decision-Making in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) Federal Budgetary Process. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting, and Financial Management. 22, (3).
37. Mansour, Ahmed M. E. (forthcoming). “Has the United Arab Emirates Federal Government Succeeded to Transform Its Federal Bureaucracy into A New Public Management System?”. Accepted for publication in the International Public Management Review (IPMR)
38. Mansour, Ahmed M. E., 2015. “Wiki-Government as Coproduction of Public Policies and Services: Feasibility Study for the United Arab Emirates,” Australian Journal of Sustainable Business and Society. 1 (1), March 2015.
39. Mendoza, G.A. and Martins, H. 2006. Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis in Natural Resource Management: A Critical Review Of Methods And New Modelling Paradigms. Forest Ecology and Management Volume, 15 July 2006, Pages 1–22
40. Moran, Michael, Rein, Martin, and Goodin, Robert 2006. The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press
41. Ostrom, Elinor, 1998. “A Behavioral Approach to the Rational Theory of Collective Action.” American Political Science Review 92 March (1)1-22.
42. Ostrom, Elinor, Cox, Michael, and Schlager, Edela, 2014. “Institutional Analysis and Development.” in Sabatier, Paul B., and Weible, Christopher M. (Eds.) (2014). Theories of the Policy Process. Boulder, Colorado.
43. Pearce, D.W., 1983. Cost-Benefit Analysis, London: Macmillan.
44. RAND-Qatar Policy Institute (2003-2013). Retrieved from https://www.rand.org/international/qatar.html, on Friday, 12, 2017, 5::15 pm
45. Sharkansky, Ira, 1978. Public Administration: Policy-making in Government Agencies. Chicago: Rand McNally College Publishing Company.
46. Sharp, A. M., Register, C. A, Grimes, P. W. 2008. Economics of Social Issues. Boston: McGraw- Hill Irwin.
47. Sidney S. M. 2007. “Policy Formulation: Design and Tools.” In Fischer, F., Grand J. Miller and Mara S. Sidney (eds.). Handbook of Policy Analysis: Theories, Politics, and Methods. Boca Raton, London, New York: CRC Press.79-87
48. Stokey, E. and Zeckhauser, R. 1978. A Primer for Policy Analysis. New York: W. W. Norton & Company
49. Theodoulou, S. Z., and Cahn, M. A.1995. Public Policy: The Essential Readings. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall
50. Torgerson, Douglas. 2007. “Promoting the Policy Orientation: Lasswell in Context. In Frank Fisher, Gerald J. Miller and Mara S. Sidney, Handbook of Policy Analysis: Theory, Methods, and Politics
51. Uphoff and Ilchman 1972. The Political Economy of Development. Berkeley and Los Angeles: The University of California Press.
52. Wagner, P. 2007. “Public Policy, Social Science, and the State: A Historical Perspective.”
53. In Fischer, F., Grand J. Miller and Mara S. Sidney (eds.). Handbook of Policy Analysis: Theories, Politics, and Methods. Boca Raton, London, New York: CRC Press. 29-40
54. Weimer, D., and Vining A. 2017. Policy Analysis: Concepts and Practice. New York Routledge l.
55. Wildavsky, A., 1979. The Politics of the Budgetary Process. Boston: Little Brown and Co.
56. Wildavsky, A., 1980. The Art and Craft of Policy Analysis. London: Macmillan.
57. Wildavsky, Aron, B., 1986. Budgeting: A Comparative Theory of the Budgeting Process. New York: Transaction Publishers.
Copyright (c) 2019 Ahmed Mustafa Elhussein Mansour
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.
SOCIALSCI JOURNAL allow the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions.
This Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.