Differences in Teacher and Student Demographic Characteristics by Middle School Accountability Rating: A Statewide, Multiyear Investigation

Keywords: Beginning teacher, Distinction designation, Ethnic/racial enrollment, Mathematics, Middle schools, Reading/English Language Arts

Abstract

In this investigation, the degree to which the percentage of beginning teachers and student ethnicity/race enrollment percentages in Texas middle schools differed between two distinction designations (i.e., Academic Achievement in Reading/English Language Arts and Academic Achievement in Mathematics) was addressed. Data for the 2012-2013 through the 2015-2016 school years were obtained from the Texas Academic Performance Reports. Statistically significant differences were yielded in the percentage of beginning teachers as a function of distinction designation. Higher percentages of beginning teachers were present in middle schools that did not meet the two distinction designations than in schools that did meet the two distinction designations. With respect to student enrollment percentages by ethnicity/race, higher percentages of Asian students and Hispanic students and lower percentages of Black students and White students were present at schools that met the two distinction designations

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Dr. Samson Moreno, Sam Houston State University

Doctoral Graduate, Department of Educational Leadership, Sam Houston State University

Dr. Cynthia Martinez-Garcia, Sam Houston State University

Associate Professor, Department of Educational Leadership

Dr. John R. Slate, Sam Houston State University

Full Professor, Department of Educational Leadership

References

Adamson, F. A., & Darling-Hammond, L. (2012). Funding disparities and the inequitable distribution of teachers: Evaluating sources and solutions. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 20(37), 1-42. Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/1053/1024

Alliance for Excellent Education. (2004). Tapping the potential: Retaining and developing high-quality new teachers. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://all4ed.org/wp-content/uploads/2007/07/TappingThePotential.pdf

Alliance for Excellent Education. (2016a). Every Student Succeeds Act primer: Accountability. Retrieved from http://all4ed.org/wpcontent/uploads/2015/12/ESSAPrimer-Accountability2.pdf

Alliance for Excellent Education. (2016b). Every Student Succeeds Act primer: Teachers and school leaders. Retrieved from http://all4ed.org/wpcontent/uploads/2015/12/ESSAPrimer-Teachers2.pdf

Borman, G., & Dowling, M. (2010). Schools and inequality: A multilevel analysis of Coleman's equality of educational opportunity data. Teachers College Record, 112, 1201-1246. Retrieved from ERIC database. (EJ888475)

Boyd, D., Grossman, P., Lankford, H., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. (2008). Teacher preparation and student achievement. NBER working paper No. 14314. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED502819)

Bracey, G. W. (2006). Dropping in on dropouts. Phi Delta Kappan, 87, 798-799. Retrieved from ERIC database. (EJ345288)

Bransford, J., Darling-Hammond, L., & LePage, P. (2005). Introduction. In L. Darling-Hammond & J. Bransford (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do (pp. 1-39). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. doi:10.5860/choice.43-1083

Bullough, R., Burbank, M., Gess-Newsome, J., Kauchak, D., & Kennedy, C. (1998). What matters most: Teaching for America's future? A faculty response to the Report of the National Commission on Teaching and America's Future. Journal of Education for Teaching, 24(1), 7-32. doi:10.1080/02607479819890

Clotfelter, C. T., Ladd, H. F., & Vigdor, J. L. (2006). Teacher-student matching and the assessment of teacher effectiveness. Journal of Human Resources, 41, 778-820. Retrieved from ERIC database. (EJ345288)

Clotfelter, C. T., Ladd, H. F., & Vigdor, J. L. (2007). How and why do teacher credentials matter for student achievement? NBER working paper No. 12828. doi:10.3386/w12828

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. doi:10.4324/9780203771587

Coronado, J. M. (2009). Quality mentoring: The missing link in retaining beginning teachers. Southeastern Teacher Education Journal, 2(3), 113-121.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Education Policy Analysis Archives. doi:10.14507/epaa.v8n1.2000

Darling-Hammond, L. (2008). A future worthy of teaching for America. Phi Delta Kappan, 89, 730-736. doi:10.1177/003172170808901008

Darling-Hammond, L., & Sykes, G. (2003). Wanted: A national teacher supply policy for education: The right way to meet the "Highly Qualified Teacher" challenge. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 11(33), 1-55. doi:10.14507/epaa.v11n33.2003 Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015, 20 U.S.C. § 6301 (2015).

Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Foley, G., & Nelson, S. (2011). The impact of annual yearly progress on middle school principal’s job satisfaction. National Forum of Educational Administration & Supervision Journal, 28(2), 27-50.

Gagnon, D. J., & Mattingly, M. J. (2015). Rates of beginning teachers: Examining one indicator of school quality in an equity context. Journal of Educational Research, 108, 226-235. doi:10.1080/00220671.2013.878300

Galambos, N. L., & Costigan, C. L. (2003). Emotional and personality development in adolescence. In R. M. Lerner, M. A. Easterbrooks, & J. Mistry (Eds.), Handbook of psychology; Vol. 6 (pp. 351-372). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Goldhaber, D. (2016). In schools, teacher quality matters most. Education Next, 16(2), 56-62. Retrieved from http://educationnext.org/files/ednext_XVI_2_goldhaber.pdf

Goldhaber, D., Lavery, L., & Theobald, R. (2015). Uneven playing field? Assessing the teacher quality gap between advantaged and disadvantaged students. Educational Researcher, 44, 293-307. doi:10.3102/0013189x15592622

Greenlee, B., & Brown, J. (2009). Retaining teachers in challenging schools. Education, 130(1), 96-109. doi:10.3102/0013189x15592622

Hanushek, E. A. (1999). Some findings from an independent investigation of the Tennessee STAR experiment and from other investigations of class size effects. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21(2), 143-63. doi:10.2307/1164297

Hanushek, E. A. (2011). The economic value of higher teacher quality. Economics of Education Review, 30, 466-479. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2010.12.006

Hanushek, E. A., & Rivkin, S. G. (2012). The distribution of teacher quality and implications for policy. Annual Review of Economics, 4, 131-157. doi:10.1146/annurev-economics-080511-111001

Hunt, J. W. (2008). “A Nation at Risk” and No Child Left Behind: Déjà vu for administrators? Phi Delta Kappan, 89, 580-585. doi:10.1177/003172170808900809

Ingersoll, R. M. (2004). Four myths about America's teacher quality problem. Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education. 103(1):1-33. doi:10.1111/j.1744-7984.2004.tb00029.x

Ingersoll, R. M., & Smith, T. M. (2004). Do teacher induction and mentoring matter? NASSP Bulletin, 88(638), 28-40. doi:10.1177/019263650408863803

Ingersoll, R. M., & Strong, M. (2011). The impact of induction and mentoring programs for beginning teachers: A critical review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 81, 201-233. doi:10.3102/0034654311403323

Jacob, A. (2012). Examining the relationship between student achievement and observable teacher characteristics: Implications for school leaders. International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 7(3), 1-13. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ997469.pdf

Jimenez-Castellanos, O. (2012). Revisiting the Coleman Report: Deficit ideologies and federal compensatory funding in low-income Latino school communities. Association of Mexican American Educators Journal, 6(2), 48-53. Retrieved from http://amaejournal.utsa.edu/index.php/amae/article/view/91/74

Johanningmeier, E. V. (2010). "A Nation at Risk" and "Sputnik": Compared and reconsidered. American Educational History Journal, 37, 347-365. Retrieved from ERIC database. (EJ911587)

Johnson, B., & Christensen, L. (2012). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Kuperminc, G. P., Leadbeater, B. J., & Blatt, S. J. (2001). School social climate and individual differences in vulnerability to psychopathology among middle school students. Journal of School Psychology, 39(2), 141-159. doi:10.1016/S0022-4405(01)00059-0

Laczko-Kerr, I., & Berliner, D. (2002). The effectiveness of Teach for America and other under-certified teachers. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 10(37). Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/download/316/442

Lopez, S. A., & Slate, J. R. (2014). Differences in beginning teacher percentages for Texas elementary schools as a function of achievement distinctions. International Journal of Psychology Research, 9, 333-344.

Martin, K. L., Buelow, S. M., & Hoffman, J. T. (2016). New teacher induction: Support that impacts beginning middle-level educators. Middle School Journal, 47(1), 4-12. doi:10.1080/00940771.2016.1059725

Martinez-Garcia, C., & Slate, J. R. (2010). Texas high schools and new teachers: A multi-year statewide study. Current Issues in Education, 13(3), 1-28. Retrieved from http://cie.asu.edu/ojs/index.php/cieatasu/article/view/524/108

Martinez-Garcia, C., & Slate, J. R. (2012a). Elementary school campuses and new teachers: A multi-year study. Education & Urban Society, 44(1), 83-96. doi:10.1177/0013124510380907

Martinez-Garcia, C., & Slate, J. R. (2012b). New high school teachers and accountability ratings: A five-year statewide study. Journal of Education Research, 6, 299-313.

Midgley, C., Anderman, E., & Hicks, L. (1995). Differences between elementary and middle school teachers and students: A goal theory approach. Journal of Early Adolescence, 15(1), 90-113. doi:10.1177/0272431695015001006

Moreno, S., & Slate, J. R. (2015). Differences in beginning teacher percentages by accountability rating and school level. Progress in Education, Volume 33. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Publishers. National Center for Education Statistics. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity (Report No. OE-38001). Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED012275)

National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. An open letter to the American People. A report to the nation and the Secretary of Education. (Stock No. 065-000-00177-2). Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED226006)

National Commission on Teaching & America's Future. (1996). What matters most: Teaching for America's future. Report of the National Commission on Teaching & America's Future. (Report No. ISBN-0-9654535-0-2). Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED395931) No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, 20 U.S.C. § 6319 (2002).

Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Daniel, L. G. (2002). Uses and misuses of the correlation coefficient. Research in the Schools, 9(1), 73-90.

Perkins, D. F., & Borden, L. M. (2003). Positive behaviors, problem behaviors, and resiliency in adolescence. In R. M. Lerner, M. A. Easterbrooks, & J. Mistry (Eds.), Handbook of psychology; Vol. 6 (pp. 373-394). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. doi:10.1002/0471264385.wei0615

Peske, H. G., & Haycock, K. (2006). Teaching inequality: How poor and minority students are shortchanged on teacher quality. Washington, DC: The Education Trust. Retrieved from http://www2.edtrust.org/NR/rdonlyres/010DBD9FCED8-4D2B-9E0D-91B446746ED3/0/TQReportJune2006.pdf

Rivkin, S. G., Hanushek, E. A., & Kain, J. F. (2005). Teachers, schools, and academic achievement. Econometrica, 73, 417-458. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0262.2005.00584.x

San Antonio, D. M., & Salzfass, E. A. (2007). How we treat one another in school. Educational Leadership, 64(8), 32-38. doi:10.1017/s0031819108000442

Santrock, J. W. (2008). Texas version: Educational psychology (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.

Schmidt, W. H., Cogan, L. S., & McKnight, C. C. (2011). Equality of educational opportunity: Myth or reality in U.S. schooling? American Educator, 34(4), 12-19. Retrieved from ERIC database. (EJ909927)

Slavin, R. E. (2012). Educational psychology: Theory and practice (10th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.

Smith, T. M., & Ingersoll, R. M. (2004). What are the effects of induction and mentoring on beginning teacher turnover? American Educational Research Journal, 41, 681-714. doi:10.3102/00028312041003681

Susman, E. J., Dorn, L. D., & Schiefelbein, V. L. (2003). Puberty, sexuality, and health. In R. M. Lerner, M. A. Easterbrooks, & J. Mistry (Eds.), Handbook of psychology; Vol. 6 (pp. 351-372). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. doi:10.1002/0471264385.wei0612

Texas Education Agency. (2014a). 2014 Accountability manual: Chapters 2-9. Retrieved from https://rptsvr1.tea.texas.gov/perfreport/account/2014/manual/ch02-09.pdf

Texas Education Agency. (2014b). Glossary for the Texas Academic Performance Report for 2013-2014. Retrieved from http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/perfreport/tapr/2014/glossary.pdf

Towers, J. M. (1992). Twenty-five years after the Coleman report: What should we have learned. Contemporary Education, 63(2), 93-95. doi:10.1080/00098655.1992.10114184

Whitehurst, G. J. (2002). Improving teacher quality. Spectrum: Journal of State Government, 75(3), 12.

Youngs, P., Hyun-Seung, K., & Pogodzinski, B. (2015). How middle school principals can affect beginning teachers' experiences. Journal of School Leadership, 25(1), 157-189.

Published
2019-12-16
How to Cite
Moreno, S. A., Martinez-Garcia, C., & Slate, J. R. (2019). Differences in Teacher and Student Demographic Characteristics by Middle School Accountability Rating: A Statewide, Multiyear Investigation. SOCIALSCI JOURNAL, 5, 277-298. Retrieved from https://purkh.com/index.php/tosocial/article/view/619
Section
Research Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)